Back to Insights
WealthUnited Arab Emirates·Jul 20256 min
DIFC vs ADGM for LatAm Family Offices: 2025 operational comparison
Two free zones, two models. We compare costs, minimum substance, applicable treaties and QFZP eligibility between Dubai International Financial Centre and Abu Dhabi Global Market.
By T&C Consulting Group
Regulatory framework
Both are financial free zones with their own English common-law-based legal systems and independent courts. Both offer access to the 0% Corporate Tax via Qualifying Free Zone Person (QFZP), subject to substance and qualifying activities.
Material differences
| Variable | DIFC | ADGM |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2004 | 2015 |
| Corporate population | ~6,900 entities | ~2,400 entities |
| FO licence cost | USD 8,000 base | USD 2,500 base |
| Minimum substance | 1 CR director + 1 AML officer | 1 CR director + 1 AML officer |
| Family Office vehicle | DIFC Family Arrangements Regime | ADGM Foundation + holding SPV |
| Succession regime | DIFC Wills (incl. non-Muslims) | ADGM Wills + Foundation Statute |
| UAE treaties accessible | Yes (UAE 145+ DTAs) | Yes (same DTAs) |
Which to choose
- DIFC preferred for family offices with strong banking component, discretionary managers and when the principal operates daily in Dubai.
- ADGM preferred for pure wealth structures (foundations, passive holding) due to lower operating cost and statutory flexibility of the Foundations Regime.
Practical recommendation
In 2025 we see a consistent pattern: LatAm family offices with AUM > USD 100M choose DIFC; three-generation succession vehicles gravitate to ADGM Foundations. The final decision must model access to specific treaties (Spain, Colombia, Mexico) and the jurisdiction of underlying assets.